Service Level Agreement
A formal contract between a service provider and a customer that defines the expected level of service, including measurable metrics such as uptime guarantees, response times, support availability, and the remedies or penalties for failing to meet these commitments.
A Service Level Agreement (SLA) establishes the contractual foundation for service delivery expectations between a provider and its customers. In the context of information security and compliance, SLAs typically address system availability (e.g., 99.9% uptime), performance benchmarks (response times, throughput), support responsiveness (time to acknowledge and resolve issues by severity), data handling commitments (backup frequency, retention, recovery objectives), security commitments (encryption standards, access controls, incident notification timelines), and remedies for non-compliance (service credits, termination rights). SLAs transform abstract service promises into measurable, enforceable commitments.
SLAs are relevant to compliance in several ways. ISO 27001 Annex A controls on supplier relationships (A.5.19-A.5.23) require that security requirements are addressed in supplier agreements, and SLAs are the primary vehicle for codifying these requirements. SOC 2 reports often reference the system's service commitments and system requirements, which are typically defined in SLAs. When these commitments relate to availability, an SLA becomes part of the SOC 2 evaluation scope. GDPR Article 28 requires written agreements between controllers and processors that include specific data protection provisions — these are often incorporated into or referenced alongside SLAs. NIS2 requires essential entities to assess the quality of their suppliers' services, and SLAs provide the benchmarks against which quality is measured.
For SaaS companies, well-designed SLAs serve both commercial and compliance purposes. From a commercial perspective, they build customer confidence and differentiate the service in the market. From a compliance perspective, they demonstrate that the organization has defined service commitments and has mechanisms to measure and report against them. Organizations should ensure their SLAs are realistic and achievable (promising 100% uptime is neither credible nor achievable), supported by monitoring and reporting systems that can verify compliance, reviewed and updated as service capabilities evolve, and aligned with the organization's internal operational capabilities and its own dependencies on upstream providers. SLA management should include regular reporting to customers, transparent incident communication, and continuous improvement of service delivery to consistently exceed commitments.
Related frameworks
Related terms
Business Continuity
The capability of an organization to continue delivering products and services at acceptable predefined levels following a disruptive incident. Business continuity planning covers the strategies, plans, and procedures needed to ensure operational resilience.
Continuous Monitoring
An ongoing, automated process of observing and evaluating the security posture, compliance status, and operational health of an organization's systems and controls in real time or near-real time, enabling rapid detection of deviations, vulnerabilities, and threats.
Third-Party Assurance
The independent validation of a service provider's security controls, processes, and compliance posture through recognized frameworks such as SOC 2 reports, ISO 27001 certification, or other standardized assessments that customers can rely upon to evaluate the provider's trustworthiness.
Vendor Risk Management
A systematic program for evaluating, monitoring, and mitigating the security and compliance risks introduced by third-party vendors, suppliers, and service providers throughout the entire vendor relationship lifecycle.
Assess your compliance posture
Run a free self-assessment for ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR, NIS2, or Tech DD and see exactly where you stand.
Start free assessment