Skip to content
AuditFront
P7.1 SOC 2

SOC 2 P7.1: Privacy - Quality of Personal Information

What This Control Requires

The entity collects and maintains accurate, up-to-date, complete, and relevant personal information for the purposes identified in the notice to meet the entity's objectives related to privacy.

In Plain Language

Bad data creates bad outcomes for real people. If your records show the wrong address, the wrong account status, or outdated information, decisions made from that data will be wrong too - and that is a privacy problem, not just a data quality problem.

Keeping personal data accurate, current, complete, and relevant is an ongoing effort. You need validation at the point of collection, ways for individuals to review and correct their own data, periodic quality checks, and a process for cleaning up problems when you find them. Holding onto data that is no longer relevant to any current purpose just increases your exposure for no benefit.

Auditors look for evidence that you have data quality controls in place, that individuals can actually review and correct their records, that you run periodic quality assessments, and that you act on what those assessments reveal.

How to Implement

Put data quality controls at every collection point. Validate inputs for accuracy and completeness when data first enters the system. Check email formats, phone number structures, postal addresses, and date ranges. Implement duplicate detection to prevent multiple records for the same person.

Give individuals self-service tools to review and update their own information. Account settings pages, profile management interfaces, and preference centres are the most scalable way to keep data accurate. If people can fix their own records, they will.

Schedule periodic data quality assessments. Use automated tools to catch common issues: duplicates, outdated records, invalid formats, and orphaned entries. Track data quality metrics over time so you can spot trends rather than just point-in-time problems.

Define validation rules for specific data elements. Verify that email addresses resolve, check mailing addresses against postal databases, confirm phone numbers are valid, and ensure dates fall within reasonable ranges. Apply these rules both during collection and periodically against existing records.

Create a clear remediation process. When quality issues surface, assess severity, prioritise, and correct. Some problems can be fixed automatically (standardising formats). Others need manual review or direct outreach to the individual. Track remediation work and verify corrections propagate across all systems.

Review data for continued relevance. Purposes change and time passes. Some personal data you hold may no longer serve any current legitimate purpose. Identify it, flag it, and apply your retention policies. Accumulating data you do not need is a liability, not an asset.

Evidence Your Auditor Will Request

  • Data quality controls at collection points including validation rules and duplicate detection
  • Self-service data review and correction mechanisms available to data subjects
  • Periodic data quality assessment reports with metrics and identified issues
  • Data quality remediation records showing correction of identified issues
  • Data relevance review records showing removal of data no longer needed for stated purposes

Common Mistakes

  • No input validation at data collection points, allowing inaccurate or incomplete data to enter the system
  • Individuals have no way to review or correct their personal information in the system
  • Data quality assessments are not conducted, allowing accuracy issues to persist indefinitely
  • Duplicate records exist for the same individual across multiple systems without reconciliation
  • Personal data that is no longer relevant to any current purpose continues to be retained

Related Controls Across Frameworks

Framework Control ID Relationship
ISO 27001 A.5.34 Partial overlap
ISO 27001 A.8.11 Related

Frequently Asked Questions

How do we balance data quality with data minimization?
They actually work together, not against each other. Collect only what you need (minimisation) and make sure what you collect is accurate (quality). Do not gather extra data just to cross-check other data - use external validation services like address verification instead. And remove anything that no longer serves a current purpose. Less data, higher quality, lower risk.
How often should we conduct data quality reviews?
It depends on how fast the data goes stale. Contact information like addresses and phone numbers changes frequently - review it quarterly or semi-annually. More stable data can be checked annually. For customer-facing applications, prompt users to verify their information during natural touchpoints: annual account reviews, login after a long absence, or when they contact support.
What if we discover systemic data quality issues?
Dig into the root cause first. Is it a collection problem, a system integration glitch, or a migration artefact? Fix the source so new data comes in clean. For existing affected records, choose the right approach: automated correction where feasible, manual review for tricky cases, or reaching out to individuals for verification. Document the whole thing - the issue, the root cause, and the fix. Auditors appreciate seeing that you found a systemic problem and dealt with it properly.

Track SOC 2 compliance in one place

AuditFront helps you manage every SOC 2 control, collect evidence, and stay audit-ready.

Start Free Assessment