SOC 2 A1.3: Availability - Recovery Plan Testing
What This Control Requires
The entity tests recovery plan procedures supporting system recovery to meet its objectives. Testing is performed at least annually and includes the ability to restore processing within defined recovery time objectives.
In Plain Language
A recovery plan that has never been tested is just a wish list. Auditors know this, and they will specifically ask for evidence that you've validated your recovery procedures under realistic conditions - not just reviewed them in a meeting room.
This means conducting structured tests of your disaster recovery and business continuity plans at least annually, measuring actual recovery times against your defined RTOs and RPOs, identifying gaps during testing, and updating plans based on what you find. Tests need to be realistic enough to prove the plan works, while controlled enough not to take down production.
Assessors specifically look for evidence that recovery plans have been tested at least annually, that test results document actual recovery time and any data loss, that gaps found during testing have been addressed, and that you can demonstrate your ability to meet availability commitments through validated recovery capabilities.
How to Implement
Build a recovery testing schedule covering all critical systems and processes. Specify which systems get tested, the test type (tabletop, functional, or full failover), frequency, required participants, and success criteria including RTO and RPO targets. Every critical system should be tested at least annually.
Use different types of tests based on system criticality. Tabletop exercises walk through recovery procedures to spot procedural gaps. Functional tests involve actual recovery activities in a controlled setting, like restoring data to a test environment. Full failover tests simulate a complete disaster by switching operations to your DR environment. Use a progressive approach - start with tabletop, then advance to full failover.
Document test plans and results thoroughly. For each test, record the objective, scope, test scenario (what disruption you're simulating), step-by-step activities, actual recovery time compared to the RTO target, data integrity verification results, issues and observations, and corrective actions identified.
Bring all relevant stakeholders into recovery testing. Include operations, engineering, security, business unit representatives, and management. Everyone should understand their role during a recovery event and participate in verifying that recovered services meet business requirements.
Track and fix issues found during testing. Create action items for each gap, assign owners, set remediation timelines, and verify fixes through subsequent testing. Maintain a tracking mechanism showing issues are actually resolved, not just documented.
Report test results to management and the board. Summarise test activities, results, gaps, and remediation status. Flag any cases where recovery times exceeded RTO targets or data loss exceeded RPO targets. Use test results to justify investments in recovery infrastructure improvements when needed.
Evidence Your Auditor Will Request
- Recovery testing schedule showing planned tests for all critical systems at least annually
- Test plans for each recovery exercise including scenarios, success criteria, and participants
- Test results documentation showing actual recovery times versus RTO targets
- Issue tracking records from recovery tests with remediation actions and verification
- Management reports summarizing recovery test results and improvement actions
Common Mistakes
- Recovery plan testing is not performed annually for all critical systems
- Tests are superficial (tabletop only) without functional validation of actual recovery capabilities
- Test results are not documented, preventing demonstration of RTO/RPO compliance
- Issues identified during testing are documented but not remediated before the next test cycle
- Recovery testing scope does not include all critical systems, leaving gaps in recovery validation
Related Controls Across Frameworks
Frequently Asked Questions
What constitutes an adequate recovery test?
Can we test recovery without affecting production?
What should we do if recovery testing shows we cannot meet our RTO?
Track SOC 2 compliance in one place
AuditFront helps you manage every SOC 2 control, collect evidence, and stay audit-ready.
Start Free Assessment