NIS2 Art.30.1: Cooperation Group and Strategic Coordination
What This Control Requires
A Cooperation Group is hereby established in order to support and facilitate strategic cooperation and the exchange of information among Member States and to strengthen mutual trust and confidence.
In Plain Language
Understanding where regulatory expectations are heading is half the battle with NIS2 compliance. The Cooperation Group - made up of Member State representatives, the European Commission, and ENISA - shapes how NIS2 requirements are interpreted and enforced across the EU.
You will not sit at their table, but their decisions directly affect you. The Group develops implementation guidance, promotes best practice exchange between Member States, works to harmonise divergent approaches, and advises on how NIS2 applies to specific sectors. Their output signals what supervisors will focus on next.
While Cooperation Group guidance is not technically legally binding, it represents the collective view of EU cybersecurity regulators. Ignoring it puts you at odds with regulatory expectations in practice, even if not in law.
How to Implement
Set up a regulatory intelligence function that tracks Cooperation Group outputs. Watch for implementation guidance on specific NIS2 articles, best practice recommendations, sector-specific guidance, reports on common challenges and solutions, and coordinated risk assessments.
Subscribe to ENISA publications and newsletters - ENISA runs the Group's secretariat and publishes most of its output. Also monitor your national competent authority's website for national guidance that reflects Cooperation Group decisions.
When new guidance comes out, assess the impact on your compliance approach. Check whether it changes how requirements you have already implemented should be interpreted, whether new best practices suggest improvements to your security measures, whether supervisory focus areas match your current posture, and whether any gaps need remediation.
If the Cooperation Group seeks stakeholder input on sector-specific issues, participate. Industry associations often coordinate sector responses to these consultations.
Use Cooperation Group outputs as a benchmarking tool. When guidance describes how specific measures should be implemented, compare your approach and adjust where you are out of step.
Feed regulatory developments into your compliance training. Staff responsible for NIS2 compliance need to stay current as expectations evolve.
Maintain a library of relevant Cooperation Group and ENISA publications, cross-referenced with your compliance documentation. This shows regulators that you are actively tracking and responding to EU-level guidance.
Evidence Your Auditor Will Request
- Regulatory intelligence monitoring process for Cooperation Group outputs
- Records of Cooperation Group guidance reviewed and assessed
- Gap analysis conducted against new guidance or best practices
- Compliance programme updates triggered by regulatory developments
- Library of relevant Cooperation Group and ENISA publications
Common Mistakes
- Organisation unaware of Cooperation Group existence or its relevance
- No monitoring of EU-level cybersecurity guidance and policy developments
- Compliance approach static; not adapted to evolving regulatory expectations
- Sector-specific guidance not identified or applied
- Gap between published best practices and actual implementation not assessed
Related Controls Across Frameworks
| Framework | Control ID | Relationship |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 27001 | A.5.36 | Related |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Cooperation Group guidance legally binding?
Where can we access Cooperation Group outputs?
Track NIS2 compliance in one place
AuditFront helps you manage every NIS2 control, collect evidence, and stay audit-ready.
Start Free Assessment