Skip to content
AuditFront
A.5.27 ISO 27001

ISO 27001 A.5.27: Learning from information security incidents

What This Control Requires

Knowledge gained from information security incidents shall be used to strengthen and improve the information security controls.

In Plain Language

An incident you do not learn from is an incident wasted. Every security event tells you something about where your defences are weak, what attack techniques are being used against you, and how well your response actually works under pressure.

Post-incident reviews need to ask the hard questions: what happened, why did it happen, how effective was the response, and what needs to change? The answers should feed directly into improved controls, better detection, updated procedures, and targeted training.

The improvements should not stay siloed in the team that handled the incident. Patterns across multiple incidents need to be identified and addressed at a systemic level. This is how you turn individual incidents into a stronger overall security programme.

How to Implement

Make post-incident reviews mandatory for all incidents above a defined severity threshold. Schedule them within one to two weeks of closure while memories are fresh. Include everyone who was involved in the response.

Run the review as a blameless exercise focused on process improvement, not finger-pointing. Use a structured format: build a timeline from detection to resolution, perform root cause analysis (5 Whys or fishbone techniques work well), assess what went well in the response, identify what could be improved, evaluate whether existing controls were adequate, and generate specific recommendations.

Document everything in a formal lessons learned report. Each recommendation needs a clear action item with an assigned owner, priority, and target completion date. Actions might include: updating security controls, tuning detection rules, revising response procedures, improving training, strengthening access controls, patching vulnerabilities, or updating risk assessments.

Track implementation through your corrective action process. Report progress to management and ensure actions are completed on schedule. If resources are tight, escalate for prioritisation rather than letting actions go stale.

Periodically step back and analyse trends across multiple incidents. Look for recurring root causes, common attack vectors, repeated control failures, and organisational patterns. This trend analysis should feed into your annual risk assessment and security programme planning.

Evidence Your Auditor Will Request

  • Post-incident review reports for significant incidents
  • Lessons learned action items with owners and completion tracking
  • Evidence of implemented improvements resulting from incident reviews
  • Trend analysis reports across multiple incidents
  • Records of updates to controls, procedures, or training based on lessons learned

Common Mistakes

  • Post-incident reviews are not conducted or are conducted only for the most severe incidents
  • Lessons learned are documented but recommendations are not tracked or implemented
  • Reviews focus on blame rather than constructive improvement leading to underreporting
  • No trend analysis across multiple incidents to identify systemic issues
  • Improvements identified are not communicated to or implemented across the wider organization

Related Controls Across Frameworks

Framework Control ID Relationship
SOC 2 CC7.5 Equivalent
NIS2 Art.23 Partial overlap

Frequently Asked Questions

How soon after an incident should the lessons learned review be conducted?
Within one to two weeks of closure. You want memories fresh but you also need to give the team time to decompress after an intense response. For major incidents, consider a quick hot wash within 48 hours to capture immediate improvements, followed by a deeper review later. Do not let it drag on for months though - the longer you wait, the less useful the review becomes.
What is a blameless post-mortem?
It is a review focused on understanding what happened and improving processes, not on pointing fingers. The premise is that incidents usually result from system and process failures rather than one person's mistake. When people know they will not be punished for being honest, they share more - and you get better root cause analysis and more effective improvements. Blameless does not mean consequence-free in all circumstances, but the review itself should be a safe space for honest discussion.

Track ISO 27001 compliance in one place

AuditFront helps you manage every ISO 27001 control, collect evidence, and stay audit-ready.

Start Free Assessment